Article Date: 02/07/11

BURIED METAL WAS NOT DIFFERING SITE CONDITION

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Appeal of C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.

No. 57355
December 29, 2010

Overview

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has ruled that subsurface metallic objects did not constitute a differing site condition. The contract disclosed the condition. The contractor's concern regarding the nature of the objects was self-imposed.

Background

The Army Corps of Engineers awarded a contract to C.E.M.E.S. ... Log in to view the full text.

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $0.00

Already a member?

Email: REQUIRED

Password: REQUIRED

Forgot your password? Click here to have your password emailed to you.